|Title||Review of extremum postulates|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2015|
|Authors||E Veveakis, and K Regenauer-Lieb|
|Journal||Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering|
|Pagination||40 - 46|
Variational principles applied to the time derivative of the second law of thermodynamics have led to significant progress of our understanding of dynamic systems. Prigogine proved that chemical species dynamically form an oscillatory pattern of minimum of entropy production, MinEP. The opposite MaxEP3 postulate forms the foundation of continuum mechanics. The topic of which extremum is valid under what conditions is still subject of a heated debate. We posit here that the two principles emerge from a different spatial/temporal homogenisation technique. MaxEP derives from a macroscopic, continuum view of a non-equilibrium stationary state and MinEP from a microscopic discrete view of stability of a dissipative system. When both limits coincide the system can be represented by an upscaled state with reduced degrees of freedom.
|Short Title||Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering|